Even if you have never studied literature you are likely familiar with authors like Ralph Waldo Emerson or Charles Dickens. While these authors may have written in different styles and about different subject matter, they were among the most notable authors of the 19th century. To learn more about Emerson, Dickens, and other notable writers of the 19th century take a look at our new libguide on 19th Century Literature!
The libguide draws attention to some of the main collecting areas for Literature and Rare Books, such as illustrated works. Hornbake’s holdings include a variety of different kinds of illustrated works that were popular in the 19th century, from scientific illustrations (Thomas Bewick’s woodcut portrayals of animals) to satirical illustrations (Punch Magazine). The libguide also features highlights from our collection of 19th century literature, such as books published by Kelmscott Press, which reacted against the consumerism and mass production of the late 19th century by producing expensive, high quality books that doubled as works of art.
We, too, have enjoyed countless hours of trying to get our favorite villagers, catching fish and bugs (and tarantula hunting), gathering materials, crafting, and building towards that ultimate rush of achieving a 5-star island.
As the nostalgia for campus and being surrounded by fellow Terps has hit us, we began experimenting with adding images that represent UMD to our islands.
We are over a month into quarantine, and for many of us, the loss of baseball hits hard, no pun intended. In lieu of visiting the ballpark, I’ve reached for another Maryland Public Television (MPT) gem: Basically Baseball, a four episode mini-series made in 1973 when MPT was known as the Maryland Center for Public Broadcasting. Shot on-location in Florida during spring training, each 30-minute show features the Baltimore Orioles working on the field and sharing advice on technique. Heavy in hot tips and the inside scoop, Basically Baseball may not be the season as we know it, but it’s basically better than no baseball at all.
Our featured episode aired June 4, 1973. Focusing on fielding, the show acts as an instructional document for young athletes, but could also help the adults who have been recruited to coach despite having zero experience. Split into five sections (“Stance”, “The Glove”, “Ground Balls”, “The Cross-Over Step” and the all-important “Throwing the Ball”), viewers get the excitement of immediate and up-close access to baseball legends while also benefiting from their sound advice. The relatively advanced age of the show does nothing to take away from its value – the tips are as sound today as they were almost fifty years ago. In addition, Basically Baseball’s nostalgic appeal, an enduring element of baseball fandom, is massive, offering today’s fans with a time capsule to experience a slice of the Orioles’ golden years.
We may be self-isolating for the time being, but that doesn’t mean that we can’t travel the world! If you want to learn more about German history and culture, visit the Internet Archive to view digitized items from the University of Maryland’s collection of German books and periodicals.
This digital collection of 29 items spans from 1832 to 1923 and includes a variety of topics. With works on subjects as diverse as the Napoleonic Wars, the Dada movement, bacteriology, art and architecture, World War I, and German poetry, there is something for everyone!
Happy National Poetry Month! As we celebrate some of our favorite poets, it’s also an opportunity to discover someone whose poetry you may not have read before.
One poet worth examining is the Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven (1874-1927), the avant garde German poet. Von Freytag-Loringhoven was a woman of many talents. In addition to her work as a poet, von Freytag-Loringhoven was an artist who was active in the Dada movement, which rejected logic and reason in favor of absurdity.
“In the United States today, we have more than our share of the nattering nabobs of negativism.”
Rhetoric like this, found scattered throughout the hundreds of speeches performed by Vice President Spiro T. Agnew illustrates the quotable, and sometimes comedic, aspects of the nation’s most vocal Vice President. As a man of controversy and alliteration, Vice President Agnew’s voice called out to the theoretical “Silent Majority” from 1968 to 1973 to speak up about their opinions opposing “corrupted” national news media and supporting President Richard Nixon’s withdrawal from the Vietnam War among other social and political topics.
Starting in 1977, Agnew began donating his personal collection of over 500 linear feet of materials to the University of Maryland Libraries. Included in those materials, were 1,368 audiotapes spanning Agnew’s time as Governor of Maryland, the 39th Vice President of the United States, and his post-resignation career. Identified as preservation concerns and potentially high- use items, the audio recordings became a digitization priority for the University Libraries. In 2017, SCUA unit ran a pilot digitization program converting 173 of the tapes to digital recordings and making them accessible to patrons visiting the Maryland Room in Hornbake Library. In 2018, curators identified an additional 559 audio recordings within the Spiro T. Agnew papers to be digitized and made accessible to researchers.
Obtaining funds and selecting recordings was only the beginning. In November and December 2018, the 559 open reels and cassette tapes were pulled from various boxes in the Spiro T. Agnew papers. This process included verifying metadata for the materials confirming the correct material was pulled. The reels and tapes were then packed in shipping boxes and prepared for shipment to the vendor. About 40 of the open reels were previously identified as mold risks and were packaged separately with new containers for their return. The digitization vendor baked the tapes to prevent further mold damage as part of their work. We received our newly created digital files and physical materials in April. The files were then checked by staff in our Digital Conversion and Media Reformatting Lab to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the files. At that time, issues with speed, pitch, and volume were identified.
From June through August, I listened to each of the 559 audio recordings to create an accurate and searchable title and a description that informed researchers of what kind of topics were addressed during that recording. Some of the recordings were short, while others were as long as 90 minutes. While this process was tedious, all our newly digitized recordings now have unique and searchable titles and descriptions that will allow researchers to discover these material and learn more about the political climate between 1969 and 1973.
Once the metadata was complete and reviewed by our metadata librarian, the files were ingested to University Libraries’ Digital Collections and the finding aid to the collection was updated. Researchers now have access to these recordings online. Recordings with copyright protection are available for education use only on campus at the University of Maryland.
Topics of these recordings range from
the Vietnam War
urban renewal plans
dissent on college campuses
the flights of Apollo 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14
revenue sharing plans
the 1968, 1970, and 1972 campaigns
the SALT talks
foreign relations between the United States, the Soviet Union, and Soviet China
and many other political and social issues.
The recordings also demonstrate the support Agnew received from constituents, including homemade songs and voice recordings praising the Vice President for his integrity and candor.
The breadth of information that these recordings hold are not only valuable to Vice Presidential scholars and Agnew supporters, but for anyone interested in learning about the United States at the turn of the decade.
Post by Jennifer Piegols, Special Collections Services Specialist.
Jen Piegols graduated in May 2019 with her MLIS from the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland. She works in the State of Maryland and Historical Collections at UMD’s Special Collections and University Archives, and is assisting with the digitization of the collections’ unique audio recordings.
Having trouble finding primary sources? Want to research outside of Special Collections hours? Can’t visit Hornbake Library in person? No problem! This post is all about finding digitized primary sources in Special Collections and University Archives at UMD.
We have lots of digitized material from Special Collections and University Archives at the University of Maryland that is available 24/7! Look through photographs, documents, film, and audio on our Digital Collections site, browse photographs and documents on Flickr, and read books and periodicals on the Internet Archive.
Here’s a list of places to look online for our digitized content:
If you follow this blog you might remember a post about this time last year about a little exhibit we created with materials from the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America.
In the past year we have been hard at work processing the Carpenters collection, and we are happy to announce that the collection is now fully “processed.” This means that the entire collection is now represented online via a finding aid (or guide) to the folders in the collection.
We are so excited to see the campus bustling again for this new academic year! We can’t wait for all of you to come and visit us for your researching needs in Hornbake Library!
We thought it might be a great time to share some of our old photographs of students from years past. In our collections, we have pictures from all different aspects of student life on campus. You can see more photographs from our collections on Flickr or on Digital Collections UMD.
Here are a few of our favorites from over the years:
The student marching band takes a break during practice on Chapel Field in 1958.
The Women’s Recreation Association sponsored intramural sports tournaments for Maryland co-eds needing a study break or some competitive fun. In this semi-final game of a basketball tournament, the ladies of Delta Gamma score 2 points on the way to beating the ladies of Gamma Phi in 1959.
These students, oddly enough, are eyeing a suspended ham in the Maryland Agricultural College barracks in 1902!
These are some freshman at orientation in 1960!
Here are some women hanging out in the women’s dorms in 1960!
Take a look at the UMD football team from 1899!
Join the conversation
Be a part of history! Tag your photos #UMDLibraries on all your social media so we can see (and share) your UMD experiences!
Submitted by: Jennie Levine Knies, February 8, 2013
The Born-Digital Working Group has already undergone a radical change since the last blog post. Originally, the group members divided into four subgroups in order to tackle the different aspects of the born-digital workflow. We are now three. RIP Metadata subgroup. The original intent of the Metadata subgroup was to look at everything needed to create a properly-described submission information package (SIP). The group met on January 28 and quickly discovered that it was both very easy and very difficult to talk about this topic in a vacuum. We discussed the redundancies not only between our work and the work of the Tools subgroup, but also with future decisions about access to content. After much soul-searching, and a confusing white-board diagram involving a monkey, a hat, and a floppy disk, we suggested folding the Metadata subgroup into the Tools subgroup and focusing more on the initial acquisition and processing of born-digital content. Understanding the digital files and how to accession them on the digital shelf is our first real challenge.
The Tools subgroup will be using two different types of workstations to develop workflows to image, analyze, and prepare the born-digital content for submission into our repository. In the non-digital world, the work of the Tools subgroup equates to picking up archival materials from a donor, moving them from the garbage bags in which they were stored to clean records-center cartons, assigning an accession number, and describing them enough that a basic accession record can be created. We envisioned the work of the Metadata subgroup picking up at this point – at the point where the archivists would appraise, describe, place in context, and arrange the content. This is where the monkey and the hat come into the picture.
The University of Maryland currently uses a home-grown system for capturing archival description. The “monkey” is a Microsoft Access database fondly referred to as “The Beast,” into which Special Collections librarians enter all of their archival description into convenient forms, where it is then extracted using a Java-based script into a neat EAD-encoded archival finding aid and distributed online via ArchivesUM. The Beast allows for the basic metadata collection allowed by EAD – we gather series, sub series, box, folder, title, dates, physical description, and restriction information at the folder level, and occasionally at the item level. The “hat” is our Fedora-based Digital Collections repository. In a separate workflow, the University of Maryland is creating digitized content and ingesting it into our digital repository. The Digital Collections descriptive and technical metadata are also home-grown (something we hope to migrate out of in the not-so-distant future) and also much more detailed than what you might find in a traditional EAD finding aid. Like the archival collections, some material is described at a folder level and sometimes at an item level, but item-level description is more common here. Currently, the two systems do not talk to each other. We developed a process to ingest the EAD finding aids into our Fedora-based Digital Collections at the time of ingest into ArchivesUM. But what is searchable in Digital Collections for the EAD finding aids is really just a collection-level record. As a side note, the University of Maryland Libraries also host an institutional repository (DRUM), which is entirely separate and based on DSpace. DRUM already houses a great deal of born-digital content, and the distinction between what is there and what is collected by our Special Collections may be growing less clear. We also have large amounts of data (both digitized books and web archives) currently stored in the Internet Archive, not to mention descriptive metadata in our catalog, that ultimately will need to be integrated with our other digital content.
Where do born-digital materials fit into all of this? Like the rest of the five linear miles of archival collections at the University of Maryland, these items are part of archival collections, just in newer formats. Like the content in Digital Collections, they are digital, the difference being that they are not surrogates of analog items. Should born-digital materials be described in an archival finding aid? Should they be discoverable and viewable in some way in their native environment? Yes. Will our staff and users be happy about having to learn how to use another silo system to keep track of born-digital materials? Probably not. And this is why we dissolved the Metadata group. Until we know what our initial analyses and boxing/packaging process is capable of returning to us, it is a little difficult to envision by what means the archivists will be able to describe the material. Parallel to the work of the Born-Digital Working Group is the expectation that in the next two years, the University of Maryland Libraries will migrate out of their home-grown system for archival finding aids, and move to something more widely adopted, most likely ArchivesSpace. When that happens, more dynamic automated linking between Digital Collections and the archival management tool will be developed. Thinking holistically, managing born-digital content needs to fall into that workflow somehow. We still envision that the Tools subgroup will gather some requirements that will really fall more into the area of archival description, and we still plan to do some experimentation with tools that allow for metadata gathering, such as BitCurator, Archivematica and Curator’s Workbench, to better understand how these work and what parts of the workflow they might help us to capture. Is this the right approach? After much thought, it feels more manageable to us, and anything that keeps us from feeling paralyzed or overwhelmed is a step in the right direction.